Businesses Classifieds Forums Photo Gallery Chat Events Videos Features News Clubs Bookstore
Reptile & Amphibians Insects Birds Cats Dogs Exotics Horses Aquaria Ponds PetHobbyist PetPress PetSupport RescueNetwork My Account
facebook - twitter	advertising rates - site news - help - contact

Looking for a pet? Try a rescue first! Alabama Alaska American Samoa Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Columbia Fed. St. of Micronesia Florida Georgia Guam Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Marshall Islands Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota N. Mariana Islands Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Palau Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virgin Islands Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Alberta British Columbia Labrador Manitoba Newfoundland New Brunswick Nova Scotia Nunavut Northwest Territories Ontario Prince Edward Island Quebec Saskatchewan Yukon Territories Other click here to add your rescue

Tuesdays: Herps, Dog Training, Senior Cats, Fancy Cats, Pet Loss, and more!

Posted by meow2me on November 04, 2002 at 20:48:57:

In Reply to: Re: What if a posted by jld on November 03, 2002 at 20:23:34:

I guess the important thing is to work towards the concept of "no kill," even if it is not a reality. If a shelter euthanizes animals that are terminally ill and in great discomfort, I wouldn't fault them for that. The problem comes with shelters like ours in North Carolina. As I said before, they have a 45% adoption rate among their "adoptable" pool. That means that 55% of the healthy, adoptable animals are euthanized. I have no experience or knowledge of other places because I have only recently become aware of this issue (having just rescued a kitty). But if this rate is considered good for the state of North Carolina, we are a long way from the ideal.

ellen

Follow Ups: